Skip Content

Metrics 'cannot replace peer review' in the next REF

News •

The findings of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management have been published. The report, 'The Metric Tide', looks at the potential uses and limitations of research metrics and indicators, exploring their use within institutions and across disciplines.

The four UK funding bodies that manage the Research Excellence Framework (REF) - HEFCE, the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, the Scottish Funding Council, and the Department for Employment and Learning (Northern Ireland) - have been told by the independent review that ‘no set of numbers is likely to be able to capture the nuanced judgments that the REF process currently provides’, and that it is not currently feasible to assess research outputs or impacts in the REF using quantitative indicators alone, with no provision for peer review. 

The review was supported by an independent steering group that included Professor Roger Kain FBA, British Academy Vice-President for Research and HE Policy.

You can read The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management here.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close